De Web Times - Blogs

At PDC today, Microsoft gave the first public demonstration of Windows 7. Until now, the company has been uncharacteristically secretive about its new OS; over the past few months, Microsoft has let on that the taskbar will undergo a number of changes, and that many bundled applications would be unbundled and shipped with Windows Live instead. There have also been occasional screenshots of some of the new applets like Calculator and Paint. Now that the covers are finally off, the scale of the new OS becomes clear. The user interface has undergone the most radical overhaul and update since the introduction of Windows 95 thirteen years ago.

First, however, it’s important to note what Windows 7 isn’t. Windows 7 will not contain anything like the kind of far-reaching architectural modifications that Microsoft made with Windows Vista. Vista brought a new display layer and vastly improved security, but that came at a cost: a significant number of (badly-written) applications had difficulty running on Vista. Applications expecting to run with Administrator access were still widespread when Vista was released, and though many software vendors do a great job, there are still those that haven’t updated or fixed their software. Similarly, at its launch many hardware vendors did not have drivers that worked with the new sound or video subsystems, leaving many users frustrated. more…

more…

During an otherwise uneventful podcast on the S60, Nokia revealed this shot of an unnamed concept device. It features a big touchscreen interface like the HTC Touch or the iPhone, but a QWERTY keypad can fold out while the touchscreen swivels, transforming the candy bar device into a premium clamshell. We’ll have to wait and see whether or not anything comes of the concept, but if Nokia knows what’s good for them, we’ll hopefully see the real product soon enough.

Source: Gizmodo

When it’s finished in ten years, Dubai’s latest architectural monolith will be the tallest skyscraper in the world. At more than one kilometer high (3,280 feet), the Nakheel Tower will have the hundred floors.”From our perspective, we are building a tower that’s going to be over a kilometre in height. This is a complete iconic development. It may be the tallest.”

Source: http://gizmodo.com/5059258/the-highest-skyscraper-in-the-world

 Asher Moses
September 10, 2008 - 3:10PM

Apple has admitted it did not invent the iPod, which was in fact the brainchild of a British man who patented his prototype 30 years ago.

Kane Kramer, now 52, took out a worldwide patent in 1979 for a media player that looked similar to the iPod but could store only 3.5 minutes of music. He dubbed it the IXI and planned to expand its capacity as technology advanced.

more..

Source: http://www.smh.com.au/news/articles/core-ipod-invented-by-furniture-salesman/2008/09/10/1220857618764.html

The vast new Cern particle collider has only just hummed into life, but physicists are already drawing up plans for a still larger machine to answer the questions even Albert Einstein was unable to resolve.
The International Linear Collider (ILC) would be a machine up to 31 miles long, comprising two giant “guns” that would accelerate electrons and particles of anti-matter called positrons to near-light speeds before smashing them together. The results could open up some of the hottest topics in physics, such as the existence of extra dimensions, the origins of gravity and even how the big bang — the event that created the universe — happened.
“The ILC would build on the work of Cern’s new Large Hadron Collider (LHC),” said Brian Foster, professor of experimental physics at Oxford University and European director of the project. “The LHC smashes protons together to discover new particles but also generates lots of debris that obscures the fine detail. The ILC would be a much cleaner machine and tell us far more about their real nature.”
Physicists around the world have spent about £150m on designs for the new machine, nicknamed “Einstein’s telescope”, since the project was set up three years ago. About £10m has come from Britain.
This weekend 80 researchers from many countries gathered at Emmanuel College, Cambridge, to study plans for the giant detectors that would investigate the collisions. Mark Thomson, Cambridge’s newly appointed professor of experimental particle physics, who was among those present, said the new machine would cost about £4 billion, with a final design expected around 2012.
“Physics theory suggests the LHC will find a subatomic particle called the Higgs boson, but if it does, this will raise many new questions,” he said. “It would be a completely bizarre and new form of matter and we would need the ILC to really pin down its properties.”
Such a machine would have to be huge — and very different from the circular LHC. When accelerated along a curved path, electrons and positrons lose much of their energy as they emit bursts of X-rays.
The ILC would need to be completely straight, with two huge linear accelerators pointing at each other and collisions happening at the point where their respective particle beams meet. They would at first be 11 miles long but could be extended to 15 miles each. The accelerators would hurl 10 billion electrons and positrons at each other every second.
When matter meets antimatter, the particles annihilate each other, releasing a burst of energy that is converted into yet more particles plus radiation. The ILC’s beams would generate around 14,000 such collisions each second, possibly creating new combinations of particles that could answer fundamental questions.
Physicists have dreamt of such a machine for decades but the technology needed to accelerate electrons and positrons to such high speeds has been developed only in the past few years. It works by sending massive bursts of radio waves into the tunnels. The particles can lock onto these waves and “surf ” them, becoming faster with each successive wave.
Such a machine might be able to resolve some of the questions raised by Einstein’s theories of relativity. The problem for Einstein, still unresolved, was that he could not reconcile the laws of the very large with the laws of the very small. SUNDAY TIMES, LONDON

Source: Times of India